Ah, ‘’hypocrisy’’—the fine art of pretending to be better than you are. It’s like being the guy who lectures you about eating healthy while inhaling and puffing a high-nicotine cigarette. Hypocrisy isn’t just about saying one thing and doing another—it’s about putting on a show. The hypocrite doesn’t just preach moral values and fail to live up to them; they actively fake it, performing like they’re the epitome of virtue while indulging in vice behind the scenes. They don’t just break their own rules; they deceive others by making their bad behavior look noble. It’s like a magician’s trick—while everyone’s distracted by the sparkle of their supposed righteousness, the real story is happening where no one’s looking.
Hypocrisy is the Grand Canyon between what people claim to do and what they’re actually up to, and nowhere is that gap wider—or more dramatic—than in international relations. On this stage, countries love to deliver Oscar-worthy performances of righteousness, all while backstage, they’re rewriting the script to suit their own agendas.
From powerful nations preaching peace while stockpiling nukes to climate-change warriors who fly private jets to save the planet, global hypocrisy is the gift that keeps on giving. But don’t worry, hypocrisy isn’t just a human trait—it’s become a full-blown superpower in geopolitics, shaping our world in absurd, sometimes dangerous, ways.
Humans are the undisputed champions of hypocrisy. While animals are straightforward—when a cat hunts a bird, it’s not pretending to be a vegan first—humans thrive on saying one thing and doing the opposite. And when we do it on the international stage? Oh boy, it’s a masterpiece.
Picture this: nations love to throw around big ideas like democracy, freedom, and human rights. But when these shiny ideals bump up against national interests? Those ideals are shoved so far under the rug, they end up in a different zip code.
Let’s take the ‘’United States’’, for example. Uncle Sam loves to be the global ambassador of democracy, waving the flag of freedom with one hand and holding a military contract in the other. For decades, the U.S. has supported authoritarian regimes across the globe, as long as they were “our kind of dictator.”
Need an example? How about the 2003 Iraq War, where the U.S. invaded a country on the totally fake premise that there were weapons of mass destruction hidden in someone’s backyard. The stated goal? Spreading democracy. The actual result? Chaos, civil war, and a never-ending instability that’s still rocking the region. Democracy, huh? More like democrazy.
Then there’s ‘’Europe’’, that lovely continent that loves to pat itself on the back for being the guardian of human rights. They even throw in words like “dignity” and “compassion” for good measure. But when it comes to the ‘’migrant crisis’’, Europe’s compassion seems to have the attention span of a goldfish.
While European leaders host press conferences about inclusion and humanitarian values, they quietly fund countries like ‘’Libya’’ to detain migrants in conditions that would make a prison riot look like a beach vacation. Walls go up, borders tighten, and the moral high ground becomes a slippery slope. European countries preach human rights but hand over border control to regimes with human rights records that would make Dracula blush. Hypocrisy much? Europe’s got you covered.
Now, let’s move on to the ‘’United Nations’’, the place where countries gather to pretend they’re solving the world’s problems. The UN was set up after World War II with noble intentions: no more wars, no more genocides, no more bad stuff, ever again. Fast forward to today, and we’ve got a UN Security Council where five permanent members—‘’the U.S., Russia, China, France, and the UK’’—can basically hold the world hostage with their veto powers.
Remember the ‘’Syrian Civil War’’? Well, while civilians were suffering in Syria, the Security Council was busy vetoing each other’s attempts to stop the conflict. Russia was playing defense, the U.S. was playing offense, and Syria? Well, they were just playing dead. So much for maintaining peace—hypocrisy wins again.
Now, let’s talk about the true underdog in this tale of international double standards: ‘’Bangladesh’’. Imagine a country doing almost nothing to cause climate change, yet getting clobbered by rising sea levels, floods, and cyclones like it’s on nature’s dartboard. Bangladesh is one of the most climate-vulnerable countries on Earth, and here’s the kicker—it contributes less than 0.5% of global emissions.
Meanwhile, the rich, industrialized countries—who puff up like peacocks at climate summits—are still burning fossil fuels like there’s no tomorrow. They make grand promises, such as the famous 2009 pledge to give $100 billion a year to help developing nations fight climate change by 2020. Did that money ever show up? Not even close. Turns out, rich countries are great at showing up to photo ops, but when it comes to coughing up the cash, suddenly they’ve all got amnesia. Talk about the world’s worst group project.
Take the Rohingya crisis, for instance. World leaders stand at podiums, wringing their hands over human rights violations and calling for justice, all while doing absolutely nothing to back it up. It’s hypocrisy on a global scale—nations preach compassion and humanitarian aid, but when it comes to Myanmar’s ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya, the international community offers little more than strongly-worded letters and some half-hearted sanctions.
Countries that pride themselves on being champions of human rights have barely lifted a finger to meaningfully intervene. Thousands of Rohingya have fled to Bangladesh, which has been left to shoulder the burden of this humanitarian disaster with minimal support from the very countries that love to talk about refugees and justice. Europe, the U.S., and other global powers loudly criticize the atrocities, but conveniently remain silent when it comes to putting real pressure on Myanmar. They’re too busy with trade deals and political maneuvering to actually stand by the principles they so eagerly promote. The Rohingya crisis is a glaring example of how the world’s most powerful nations are willing to let human rights violations slide when it doesn’t suit their interests.
And it doesn’t stop there. Bangladesh’s garment industry, the backbone of its economy, is regularly exploited by Western fashion brands. These brands love to talk about ‘’ethical production’’ and ‘’fair wages’’, but the truth? Factories are unsafe, wages are dirt-low, and working conditions would make a sweatshop look luxurious.
Let’s not kid ourselves—hypocrisy is more than just an international annoyance. It’s outright dangerous. It fuels global inequality, pushes smaller nations into deeper crises, and leaves the world’s most vulnerable populations high and dry.
Take climate change again. Countries like Bangladesh, the Maldives, and parts of Africa are at the frontlines, yet they have the least power to do anything about it. Meanwhile, the rich countries causing the problem treat climate talks like their personal theater, full of big speeches and zero action. This double standard not only threatens millions of lives, but it also sets a global precedent where the powerful can ignore responsibility while the weak suffer the consequences.
And here’s the real kicker: hypocrisy doesn’t just hurt policies; it destroys trust. When nations consistently say one thing and do another, the global public gets wise to the game. Cynicism spreads like wildfire. Why follow international laws when the big players get to break them whenever it suits them? This hypocrisy feeds anger, resentment, and sometimes even extremism. It can destabilize entire regions, leaving the world more divided and, ultimately, more dangerous.
Take anti-Western sentiment. It’s not hard to see why people in many parts of the world roll their eyes when the West starts preaching about democracy and human rights, all while propping up corrupt regimes or launching military interventions that benefit nobody but themselves. Hypocrisy fans the flames of unrest, polarizing societies and undermining global cooperation.
So, how do we pull the plug on this hypocrisy circus? First, let’s demand ‘’accountability’’. Global institutions like the UN, the World Bank, and even climate summits need to stop letting the powerful countries bend the rules. You can’t make international law a buffet where the rich nations pick and choose what they like.
Second, countries like Bangladesh need a ‘’louder voice’’ on the global stage. They can’t just be seen as passive victims of hypocrisy—they need to help shape the rules. After all, the challenges they face, like climate change, are global problems. And solutions that come with a side of double standards? Those aren’t real solutions at all.
——————
Rajeev Ahmed
The Editor of Geopolits.com and the Author of the book titled Bengal Nexus
