Nawaz Sharif Targets Judiciary and Rivals, Claiming Conspiracy in 2017 Ouster

In a dramatic turn of events, former Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has intensified his accusations against key judicial figures and political rivals, claiming that his removal from office in 2017 was part of a calculated conspiracy. Speaking at a Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) meeting in Lahore, Sharif asserted that he possesses an audio recording of former Chief Justice Saqib Nisar, allegedly revealing a plot to depose him and install Imran Khan, leader of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), as Prime Minister.

Sharif, 74, a three-time Prime Minister, demanded accountability from the Supreme Court judges involved in his disqualification. He was ousted from his position following a Supreme Court verdict in the Panama Papers corruption case, which also led to his removal as PML-N president. His brother, Shahbaz Sharif, succeeded him as party leader.

Criticizing the judiciary, Sharif questioned the basis of his expulsion, suggesting it was unprecedented and unjust. “Judges nowhere in the world send the Prime Minister home on charges of phone calls,” he remarked, highlighting what he perceives as a miscarriage of justice.

Sharif further revealed that the purported audio evidence captures Nisar stating, “We have to remove Nawaz Sharif to bring in Imran Khan as Prime Minister.” This allegation adds fuel to the long-standing claims of judicial overreach and political maneuvering that Sharif has voiced since his ouster.

Additionally, Sharif called for an investigation into the alleged misconduct of retired Justice Mazahir Ali Naqvi, accusing him of amassing significant wealth improperly. He urged for a broader inquiry into the judges implicated in the supposed conspiracy.

Reflecting on the recent general elections, Sharif expressed discontent with the electorate for not supporting his party, questioning the voters’ decision-making process. “I ask the people… what do you think while voting? I want an answer from the nation,” he lamented, conveying his disappointment in the public’s response during the February 8 elections.

Sharif’s return to Pakistan last October, after four years in self-imposed exile in London, was met with high expectations within his party. However, his ambitions for a fourth term as Prime Minister were thwarted as PTI, despite significant challenges, managed to secure over a hundred seats.

Sharif’s allegations, if substantiated, could have far-reaching implications for Pakistan’s political landscape, potentially reigniting debates about the judiciary’s role in political affairs and the legitimacy of past electoral outcomes. As the political drama unfolds, all eyes remain on the potential ramifications of these explosive claims.